Title: Most annoying album title by Oasis?
Description: Leaden rock clods' clunkiest LP moniker?
Stephen - October 12, 2007 04:47 PM (GMT)
Following the
Stereophonic stinkers poll, here's another band who seem unable to give an album a good title.
Don't Believe the Truth is my least favourite (what's wrong with the truth, lads?) but
Familiar to Millions is also comically awful. Your thoughts?
(Don't worry – this is the last poll in the 'series'.)
snoweyuk - October 12, 2007 04:49 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Stephen @ Oct 12 2007, 05:47 PM) |
(Don't worry – this is the last poll in the 'series'.) |
No Fall version?
:o
zoot horn polo - October 12, 2007 05:24 PM (GMT)
Standing on the Shoulder of Giants .
It's just... wretched.
DJAsh - October 12, 2007 05:24 PM (GMT)
What about Phil Colllins?
799thJim - October 12, 2007 05:35 PM (GMT)
I was torn between Standing on the Shoulder of Giants, for its Giants-Sharing Shoulders, and Heathen Chemistry, for it's 70's prog title.
I've gone for HC.
Can we do Dodgy albums next Stephen? ;)
twinz2z - October 12, 2007 06:38 PM (GMT)
Familiar to millions gets worse the more you consider it, but I think, Reset your Clocks, might have sounded a bit better, than the above. Whats the story, is not so bad a title, though.
Country Folk - October 12, 2007 09:22 PM (GMT)
Be Here Now.
I can't stand 'deep' titles that mean nothing. Around the time of Britpop there seemed to be a lot of forgettable bands who released songs with supposedly profound, but ultimately forgettable, names like 'Let It Flow' or 'She Said'. I can't even remember the names of these bands now.
Forgettable title tends to mean forgettable song.
Billybigbananas - October 13, 2007 07:47 AM (GMT)
Standing on the Shoulder of Giants.
Badly, badly wrong. And a crap album.
Frederick II - October 13, 2007 11:50 AM (GMT)
It has to be Dont Believe The Truth - thats just downright silly. :grrr:
zoot horn polo - October 13, 2007 12:20 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Frederick II @ Oct 13 2007, 12:50 PM) |
| It has to be Dont Believe The Truth - thats just downright silly. :grrr: |
Makes you think, though, dunnit?
I mean like.... maybe we should be more... like... questioning... of stuff...
Mopiranger - October 13, 2007 12:24 PM (GMT)
And here I thought they had only one album with one song they just kept bringing out.
Has there been a most mondo-retardo pretentious profound statement manic street preachers album title poll yet?
autotech - October 13, 2007 10:03 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (zoot horn polo @ Oct 14 2007, 12:20 AM) |
| QUOTE (Frederick II @ Oct 13 2007, 12:50 PM) | | It has to be Dont Believe The Truth - thats just downright silly. :grrr: |
Makes you think, though, dunnit?
I mean like.... maybe we should be more... like... questioning... of stuff...
|
yeah but like, if its the truth, surely we should believe it
worthless recluse - October 15, 2007 06:25 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (autotech @ Oct 13 2007, 11:03 PM) |
| QUOTE (zoot horn polo @ Oct 14 2007, 12:20 AM) | | QUOTE (Frederick II @ Oct 13 2007, 12:50 PM) | | It has to be Dont Believe The Truth - thats just downright silly. :grrr: |
Makes you think, though, dunnit?
I mean like.... maybe we should be more... like... questioning... of stuff...
|
yeah but like, if its the truth, surely we should believe it
|
But, the Manics might point out, whose truth are we talking about? Because my truth is different to yours, and, like, Castro's truth is different to, you know, Arthur Scargill's or whatever, but it's all part of the same universal spirit of truth and the dignity of the decent working man who's just trying to get by amid the pressures of opression from corporations and the enviroment and that. But you should always be questioning reality and stuff. :mellow:
Country Folk - October 15, 2007 09:27 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (worthless recluse @ Oct 16 2007, 06:25 AM) |
| QUOTE (autotech @ Oct 13 2007, 11:03 PM) | | QUOTE (zoot horn polo @ Oct 14 2007, 12:20 AM) | | QUOTE (Frederick II @ Oct 13 2007, 12:50 PM) | | It has to be Dont Believe The Truth - thats just downright silly. :grrr: |
Makes you think, though, dunnit?
I mean like.... maybe we should be more... like... questioning... of stuff...
|
yeah but like, if its the truth, surely we should believe it
|
But, the Manics might point out, whose truth are we talking about? Because my truth is different to yours, and, like, Castro's truth is different to, you know, Arthur Scargill's or whatever, but it's all part of the same universal spirit of truth and the dignity of the decent working man who's just trying to get by amid the pressures of opression from corporations and the enviroment and that. But you should always be questioning reality and stuff. :mellow:
|
You just gotta be who you gotta be
You just gotta say what you gotta say
You just gotta do what you gotta do
You just gotta follow your own way
These words of wisdom © Country Folk and I will sue Gallagher/Weller/Ashcroft when they nick 'em for their next album. :angry:
The Encrusted Green - October 15, 2007 09:31 PM (GMT)
Pollish Immigrant - October 15, 2007 09:42 PM (GMT)
i was in disgust by the 2nd album .. i had mistook em for a much cooler band from just down cleggs lane...
oasis were like the plastic face incarnate... and only for the worst side.
Stephen - November 14, 2007 10:36 PM (GMT)
Liam Gallagher claims that Oasis would only release their next album for free over his "dead body".And how depressing is this?:
'The frontman claimed that the band has been inspired by the classic seventh albums of the Beatles (Revolver) and The Rolling Stones (Beggars Banquet). He said: "There's lots of cool parts, man. Really, we're throwing everything at it. It's gonna be cool, man."•
Interestingly enough(?),
Lily Allen also thinks it's wrong to let fans decide how much they pay for an album:
"You don't choose how to pay for eggs. Why should it be different for music?"
johnnymills - November 14, 2007 11:17 PM (GMT)
Pollish Immigrant - November 15, 2007 12:03 AM (GMT)
well we do have a tradition of busking though... and the busker never says... hey that song was 50p u robbin bastard :devil2:
spiring - November 15, 2007 06:43 AM (GMT)
I can´t say I care enough about Oasis to let their album titles annoy me.
Frederick II - November 15, 2007 10:15 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (worthless recluse @ Oct 16 2007, 06:25 AM) |
| whose truth are we talking about? Because my truth is different to yours, |
At the risk of opening up a whole can-of-worms, I happen to believe that there are universal truths, therefore, the statement dont believe the truth is a fallacy.
imaglasgowmanmyself - November 15, 2007 03:03 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (zoot horn polo @ Oct 13 2007, 01:20 PM) |
| QUOTE (Frederick II @ Oct 13 2007, 12:50 PM) | | It has to be Dont Believe The Truth - thats just downright silly. :grrr: |
Makes you think, though, dunnit?
I mean like.... maybe we should be more... like... questioning... of stuff...
|
:lol:
Stephen - December 1, 2007 08:36 PM (GMT)
S5 not Manc - December 1, 2007 08:41 PM (GMT)
Too many fucking drugs. :zip: :nahnah:
96dbFreak - December 1, 2007 08:53 PM (GMT)
Something I've always wondered about oasis is WTF is a "WONDERWALL"?
bradx - December 1, 2007 08:57 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (96dbFreak @ Dec 1 2007, 08:53 PM) |
| Something I've always wondered about oasis is WTF is a "WONDERWALL"? |
It was a film...and a soundtrack album by George Harrison.
the last time - December 2, 2007 01:06 AM (GMT)
It's all an offensive Slade rip off. (At best)
96dbFreak - December 2, 2007 06:44 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (bradx @ Dec 2 2007, 06:57 AM) |
| QUOTE (96dbFreak @ Dec 1 2007, 08:53 PM) | | Something I've always wondered about oasis is WTF is a "WONDERWALL"? |
It was a film...and a soundtrack album by George Harrison.  |
Well yes, I knew that, but it doesn't aid understanding, really, does it? I mean, what does "And after all, you're my film and soundtrack album by George Harrison" mean?
twinz2z - December 2, 2007 11:55 AM (GMT)
I blame pink floyd for taking a brick out of the wall. Shouldve left it where it was.
The grass aint no greener.
You just put yourself in a shadow, believing it might be.
cryptomoralist - December 2, 2007 12:45 PM (GMT)
Proud to say I haven't heard anything later than "What's the Story" but do think the 1st album had it's moments of promise.
:rolleyes:
EAgas1 - December 6, 2007 11:35 AM (GMT)
They made a great debut album and then beleived all their hype and went right down the trash can!!
A marginal improvement occured when Andy Bell joined and you could hear the ride inlfuence in some of the later work but that aside, they do nothing for me.
Ducky - December 6, 2007 12:36 PM (GMT)
Agree with the above. The first LP contained a rare energy, then Noel G thought he'd become an amalgam of Bacharach/Lennon/Marr and actually started to think instead of just doing.
96dbFreak - December 8, 2007 12:59 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (96dbFreak @ Dec 2 2007, 04:44 PM) |
| ...what does "And after all, you're my film and soundtrack album by George Harrison" mean? |
Ahhhh, according to Wiki:
The story of the film revolves around the reclusive, eccentric scientist Oscar Collins (MacGowran), whose next-door neighbours are a pop photographer (Quarrier) and his girlfriend/model (Birkin), named Penny Lane. Discovering a beam of light streaming through a hole in the wall between them, Collins follows the light and spots Penny modelling for a photo shoot. Intrigued, he begins to make more holes, as days go by and they do more photo sessions. Oscar gradually becomes infatuated with the girl, and feels a part of the couple's lives, even forsaking work to observe them. When they quarrel and the couple split, Penny takes an overdose of pills and passes out, and Oscar tries to come to her rescue.
So there is an actual wall involved. Now I begin to understand.
Exopsychicton - December 17, 2007 01:25 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (johnnymills @ Nov 15 2007, 11:17 AM) |
| all of them |
Absolutely.
This band makes me think, for a moment, of an alternative universe where satire has taken over and is no longer able to be recognized... I always ask myself- How did this happen?
But there is this- Long long ago, in a universe far far away, I walked into the Uptown bar in Minneapolis to see them perform their last song of the evening, a cover of I am the Walrus. They were damn good for that one song, let me tell you. Everything since is embaressing.
lustsuglychild - December 18, 2007 02:54 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Frederick II @ Oct 13 2007, 11:50 PM) |
| It has to be Dont Believe The Truth - thats just downright silly. :grrr: |
I'm with you Fred :)
Stephen - June 25, 2008 06:06 PM (GMT)
Buy Kurious! - June 25, 2008 07:33 PM (GMT)
What's worse...the album title or the first single?! <_<
Billybigbananas - June 25, 2008 09:03 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| Noel Gallagher explained the band's change in direction for the new album in a statement, saying: "I wanted to write music that had a groove, not songs that followed that traditional pattern of verse, chorus and middle eight. |
It's the Style Council isn't it?
Fritter - June 25, 2008 09:28 PM (GMT)
Granted 'Don't Believe The Truth' is pretty mind-boggling, but 'Standing On The Shoulder Of Giants' has long been an anti-favourite.
Gallagher, N. claims never to have read any books "I've lived a life instead". Nohing wrong in not having read a book per se, but his justifaication for it marks him out as a prize Twat.
Fritter - June 25, 2008 09:30 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Billybigbananas @ Jun 26 2008, 09:03 AM) |
| QUOTE | | Noel Gallagher explained the band's change in direction for the new album in a statement, saying: "I wanted to write music that had a groove, not songs that followed that traditional pattern of verse, chorus and middle eight. |
|
And I bet he thinks he's being original in saying that.