Title: The "I'm sorry my president is an Idiot" thread
Description: I didn't vote for him
Upper Rochelle - July 3, 2003 06:55 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
Bush to Iraqi Militants: 'Bring Them On'
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) had a tough message on Wednesday for Iraqi militants attacking U.S. troops -- "Bring them on" -- and said the U.S. military presence was sufficient to deal with the attackers. |
Sunnabitch. :angry:
Upper Rochelle - July 3, 2003 06:58 PM (GMT)
Whoops, wrong forum. Can you move this to the Water Cooler forum?
Las Chupacabras - July 14, 2003 02:03 PM (GMT)
This is the Water Cooler.
I also would like to apologize for the election of this cretinous ape-man to our Presidency, and would like to remind the world that he only won due to a favourable and dubious Supreme Court ruling combined with an arcane technicality in our otherwise excellent constitution. Really, we're perfectly aware he's a mendacious sack of shit, or at least I am.
Dragefolket - July 15, 2003 05:18 AM (GMT)
Upper Rochelle - July 15, 2003 07:21 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Las Chupacabras @ Jul 14 2003, 02:03 PM) |
| This is the Water Cooler. |
So it is. Fascinating... <_<
| QUOTE |
| I also would like to apologize for the election of this cretinous ape-man to our Presidency, and would like to remind the world that he only won due to a favourable and dubious Supreme Court ruling combined with an arcane technicality in our otherwise excellent constitution. Really, we're perfectly aware he's a mendacious sack of shit, or at least I am. |
Too bad the Dems are gonna get their asses kicked come 04. All Bush has got to do is cook up another war scare and land on another aircraft carrier.
Tesla Tank - July 15, 2003 04:37 PM (GMT)
Less than 50% of the population voted for him in 2000 anyway. I think it's time for an amendment in the US constitution. I believe, and this is just what I think, it may not be right, that the reason the current voting system is in place is because at the start of the union, each state had more power and the centreal government was weaker. So naturally, when more than 50% of the state population wanted one candidate, the entire state voted for him. Most people didn't care too much about politics anyway at the time. However, now the central government is much stronger and each invidividual states weaker, it makes more sense to count each Democratic and Republican representative (?) in each state. As a result, the candidate with the popular vote will win, at least more likely than the current system.
heywood - August 8, 2003 08:54 PM (GMT)
Why in the hell can't the democrats in your country get their heads out of their asses and stand behind ONE candidate. They look like a monkey fuckin a football!!
Its not that hard! stop the bickering, stop the bullshit, focus on the economy and guess what. you Win!!
Guaranteed Democrat win Al Gore president and Senator Clinton As his vice. Ding ding ding we have a winner!!!!
whew I'm done
heywood
Algoma - September 5, 2003 09:47 PM (GMT)
They have to find that candidate first.
