Title: **HELP** looking for a good languages
Description: Know any
Bob - September 25, 2003 03:04 PM (GMT)
Yo im looking for a good starting language i was gonna learn java but i learned that windows doesn't support java anymore. Do you know of any good languages to start with thanx.
Bob
Incubator - September 25, 2003 04:52 PM (GMT)
download Java Sun patch and you can use Java anytime you want :)
so youcan start with that
Bob - September 26, 2003 10:31 AM (GMT)
Bob - September 26, 2003 10:33 AM (GMT)
How about PHP or do you think that would be to difficult to start with
Stuy GM - September 26, 2003 01:25 PM (GMT)
Incubator - September 26, 2003 04:11 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Bob @ Sep 26 2003, 10:31 AM) |
| Ya but is it worth it |
what do you men is it worth it?
would be the same like asking if it would be worth installing a compiler.
If you want to learn Java (and for GUI apps itīs not bad, dreamweaver is made in it) then you should get it.
shortys team - September 26, 2003 07:05 PM (GMT)
visual basic is really good for strting
Bob - September 26, 2003 09:23 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
what do you men is it worth it? would be the same like asking if it would be worth installing a compiler. If you want to learn Java (and for GUI apps itīs not bad, dreamweaver is made in it) then you should get it. |
I mean is it worth learning java not geting the pach
and
| QUOTE |
visual basic is really good for starting |
were could i learn visual basics and what is it exacly
Thanx Bob
Incubator - September 26, 2003 11:06 PM (GMT)
As a programmer you should not bother about wether or not it is worth instaling a patch. It is up to us to make sure that the users dont have to install it (or at least make it as easy as possible for them to install it)
and besides, Jaav 1.1 is still supported by microsoft.
Higher requires the patch
and VB is quite erronous (it somhow managed to confuse a getter for a setter) and uses 20mb of memory for just a simple app, whereas C++ would use a lot less.
For decent OO programming, start with Java (yes, JBuilder also has those nice easy drag & drop components like in VB) then go for C++
MonkeyMan - September 26, 2003 11:23 PM (GMT)
I know java... i make it all simple with the simple stuff so 99.999999999% of the time they dont need to dl something.
Dragon - September 27, 2003 03:44 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| were could i learn visual basics and what is it exacly |
Microsoft Visual Basic is a program. I suggest you just start with C++.
TheHawgMaster - September 27, 2003 05:50 AM (GMT)
Microsoft Visual Basic is kind of like a cross between C++ and Ruby these days, but I suggest you just learn C++ though...
marc - September 27, 2003 12:26 PM (GMT)
I'd say css is a useful little language and easy to learn.
Bob - September 27, 2003 12:35 PM (GMT)
Im a begginer totally new shoul i s tart with C++ or Java
Bob
Ps i now html if you calll that a language so i might not be a total beginer
shortys team - September 27, 2003 02:49 PM (GMT)
well i learned c++ first and its working out ok, im taking visual basic now in school and its really easy
Incubator - September 27, 2003 05:42 PM (GMT)
I learned first ansi-c & cobol, then VB & Java (basic) & ASP, then C++ (basic) & PHP, had to postpone api due to interruption by forced education of VB .NET & Java AWT / Swing
C was for me a very good start.
Bob - September 27, 2003 08:04 PM (GMT)
But you need to buy a program for C++ correct
Incubator - September 27, 2003 09:55 PM (GMT)
gcc, g++ & kdevelop i use most
GNU/GPL-licensed they are :)
or otherwise for in windows you can use the free dev-c++ from bloodsched.
But yes, Borland C++Builder 6 or Visual Studio must be bought
Bob - September 27, 2003 10:03 PM (GMT)
Is Dev-C++ from bloodshed any good iv tryed it andit didn't work very well is sthere a site about it i got it off a cd-r
TheHawgMaster - September 27, 2003 11:59 PM (GMT)
DevC++ uses the somewhat-crappy MingW compiler, but it's OK for beginners. After you're a little more used to C++ in general you should have no problems using the free Borland Command Line Compiler, which does a much better job than DevC++. If you use the free Borland compiler you can make it easier by using the tools written by Dr Voodoo or Dragon.
Bob - September 28, 2003 10:52 AM (GMT)
And where could i get this Borland Command Line Compiler
Stuy GM - September 28, 2003 12:36 PM (GMT)
DR. Voodoo has it on his site :)
Bob - September 28, 2003 01:51 PM (GMT)
So you guys are leading me away from java so your sugesting i learn c++ goood thats what i wanted to learn but other people keep telling me its not a good starting language, <_< java is easier right
Shadow of the Moon - September 28, 2003 05:22 PM (GMT)
Java is basically C++ with a few extras. It isn't the best app programming languange. It is very difficult and expensive to actually compile it. Java works better for servers and network stuff.
Sam Fisher vs Solid Snake - September 28, 2003 07:40 PM (GMT)
Basic is an extremley easy language, for example
;Closes program after pressing ESC
Print "Why did you open this progrram?"
Repeat
Print "Press Esc to exit."
Delay 1000 ;wait for 1 second
Until KeyHit(1)
Print "Program is ending"
All this does is it keeps repaeatin until somebody presses esc(1)
Bob - September 28, 2003 09:08 PM (GMT)
Sounds kinda boring though doesn't it?
Bob - September 28, 2003 09:11 PM (GMT)
in respounds to
| QUOTE |
| Java is basically C++ with a few extras. It isn't the best app programming languange. It is very difficult and expensive to actually compile it. Java works better for servers and network stuff. |
So what your saying is Java is easier and cheaper than C++ than why would you use C++ and what are the "Extras"
Shadow of the Moon - September 28, 2003 11:17 PM (GMT)
Java has garbage collection, and you don't have to worry about pointers. You cannot compile the code, though. Well, technically you can, but the tools are very expensive.
Bob - September 28, 2003 11:27 PM (GMT)
What do you mean by compile and expensive sorry im tottaly new to this is C++ that much harder than Java and what exacly is PHP
Incubator - September 29, 2003 05:53 PM (GMT)
actually, javac.exe is free, it compiles the .java source to .class files
however, this is of course not assembly (or anything that has good speed) and thus needs to rely on the java VM and JIT-compiler (Just-In-Time)
Bob - September 29, 2003 07:52 PM (GMT)
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh................ right what do you mean by "compile and "at any real speed??? :( Are there any websites yo know of that could halp me out
Incubator - September 29, 2003 10:43 PM (GMT)
Bob - October 2, 2003 02:40 PM (GMT)
Where can i find the pach for java on java.sun.com i looked for it but i couldnt find it
Incubator - October 2, 2003 04:09 PM (GMT)
Bob - October 2, 2003 10:44 PM (GMT)