As the representative of the Manly Cannons and of employee Aaron Moule, I Dr Kermit Krockett Q.C. would like to publically reassure everyone that Aaron Moule had nothing at all to do with the Magro incident. In terms of handing out a beating, Aaron Moule would do nothing of the sort without myself knowing about it and trust me, I knew nothing. Also Aaron Moule had nothing to do with the compromising positions the Magro's were found in as he simply was not there. Furthermore, I believe that the Magro's knew nothing of what was in store for them when the ASRL's resident 'low-blower,' Brian Randell attacked them. I'm conclusion I suggest to Brian Randell that he needs to find other scapegoats for blaming his various fantasy creation situations upon, as I again reiterate, that using others as human putty to depict incestual scenarios will, as it always has, remain the sole domain of Brian Randell and not that of Aaron Moule.

Dr Kermit Krockett Q.C.

Brian Randell was released after the accusations that he and Arron Moule, had conspired to physically abuse the Magro brothers, had been proved false. Straight after being released he was rushed to a press conference to tell his account of the dealings that took place on the saturday night.

"I come to you a man accussed of assault and battery and one charge of suscrpition to the sabrina magazine (in the background the slight ting of drum is heard). I would like to make it clear to everyone that I have been released and not charged with anything. At no point on saturday night did I or Arron Moule attack the Magros, sure we had planned to but they were found that way. Someone out there tryed to set up Moule and myself up. I am eager to find out who this person is, I have my sources and we will find you. Anyway thats not why I brought you here. I am here today to show you my first single in the hugely anticipated album, Up You All. My first single off the album is called Stinkin Wogs Gonna Get It, you can pick this CD up at all good liquor stores throughout Australia. I would like to thank my producers at Jim Beam for giving me the opportunity to realease my talents onto CD. And to Mr Kermit if you think that was a low blow, you aint seen nothing yet."

My proper title is Dr Krockett, thank you Master Randell. I did not study hard to be called Kermit by peoples with the intellect of a schrew.

I'm sorry Dr Krockett but if you wish to adress me it is Mr. Randell not Master Randell. I did not live 19 years to be referred to as a minor.

I had but your grammar as a guide for me to ascertain your title. My most humbles apologies, Mr. Randell. Despite this I see little reason for you to persue 'Mister' over 'Master' for there is little an individual must do to achieve 'Mister' status. For example, I have a bloodhound who has just turned 20. Would this also make him Mr. Charles Lordington the IV, I.e. of the same category as yourself?

I'm sorry Dr. Krockett I had no idea that a man with such a grand intellect would fall prey to my substandard grammar. I would have thought a more educated man would be able to learn from the mistakes of the ill fated few. Mister and Master, if you want to use your dog as an example yes he would be a Mr., why do I hear you say, because in living all those years he has earn't the title. It is also a mark of respect. Though I doubt you have any yourself.

Sorry to shatter some illusions here guys, but Master isn't always applied to children. It's also a mark of respect to an elder, often in a position of power.

Master at Arms
Master Chef

That said, you're hardly in a position of power commanding such respect, Master Brandell.

Anyone can survive nineteen whole years, hell, Magro and Jelly have both reached that 'landmark'. Why does it command respect? Does someone get a special title for reaching forty? Sixty? One hundred?

Another point you may not wish for me to make, but the age at which the 'mister' title is traditionally inherited is 21- not 19 as you would believe. So, if you wish to 'earn the respect' of a mister title, perhaps you should strive to not die for a further two years?

Chris (Who doesn't need a prefix to make himself feel good about himself)

Sorry Chris But this time you are wrong there is actually no age limit to the title. If you want proof her it is from DICTIONARY.com.

Used as a courtesy title before the surname, full name, or professional title of a man, usually written in its abbreviated form.

No comment on age.


I don't command respect from everyone especially someone who tries to sit on a high horse like you are trying to do here. Anyone can survive nineteen years? True then they are also Mr. Magro and Mr. Adams.

Try to stay out of arguments unless you have genuine imput instead of using it as a vehicle to forward your own ego.

And as for not needing a title to make yourself feel better maybe you should look at this.

"Jelly. I'll do what I want. Do you know why? Because it's my forum and I can do whatever I want!"

I believe this was written by you. Enough said.

Well, first of all, wow- you used a dictionary. I'm glad for you, maybe next time you write an article you can use a spell-checker and a dictionary. It makes for good reading.

Now, I used one too.

MASTER From Dictionary.com as well

1. One that has control over another or others.
2.
a. The owner or keeper of an animal: The dog ran toward its master.
b. The owner of a slave.
3. One who has control over or ownership of something: the master of a large tea plantation.
4. The captain of a merchant ship. Also called master mariner.
5. An employer.
6. The man who serves as the head of a household.
7. One who defeats another; a victor.
8.
a. One whose teachings or doctrines are accepted by followers.
b. Master Christianity. Jesus.
9. A male teacher, schoolmaster, or tutor.
10. One who holds a master's degree.
11.
a. An artist or performer of great and exemplary skill.
b. An old master.
12. A worker qualified to teach apprentices and carry on the craft independently.
13. An expert: a master of three languages.
14. Abbr. M.
a. Used formerly as a title for a man holding a naval office ranking next below a lieutenant on a warship.
b. Used as a title for a man who serves as the head or presiding officer of certain societies, clubs, orders, or institutions.
c. Chiefly British. Used as a title for any of various male law court officers.
d. Master Used as a title for any of various male officers having specified duties concerning the management of the British royal household.
e. Master Used as a courtesy title before the given or full name of a boy not considered old enough to be addressed as Mister.
f. Archaic. Used as a form of address for a man; mister.
15. Master A man who owns a pack of hounds or is the chief officer of a hunt.
16. An original, such as an original document or audio recording, from which copies can be made.

Now I take it you were relying on section 14e to prove your case against Kermit? It doesn't specify an age here, but it does specify there is a certain age at which time Mr. is earned. Now, considering that traditionally a boy isn't a 'man' until his 21st birthday (hence the significance of the date and it still being the legal age for adulthood in the US, as well as other countries), logically (and considering master is an old term in this context), the age for inheriting mister would be 21.

If I don't stay out of this argument, will you bash me like you're going to bash Magro? In which case I'd better brace myself for the phantom bashing of a lifetime! :o

Have mercy O! Tyrant of the Forum! :help:

And as for not needing a title to make yourself feel better maybe you should look at this.
"Jelly. I'll do what I want. Do you know why? Because it's my forum and I can do whatever I want!"
I believe this was written by you. Enough said.

At no point in this 'quote' from you (and wow, you put it in quotation marks and everything) do I command respect through the use of a prefix. My statement was saying I didn't need one, and I don't. I command respect because I am me. You, however, being a lowly peon- require a title to earn respect.

May I suggest 'Grandmaster of Whinging and Bitching'? It fits, but it's a suffix. How about 'Lady'?

Lady Brandell, Grandmaster of Whinging and Bitching?

Does that better suit?

Love Always,
Chris

Chris Jericho likes to be referred to as a number of things.

King of the World
Larger than Life Livign Legend
Huge Rock Star
Ayatollah of Rock and Rollah
King of Bling Blin
First ever UNDISPUTED Champion

Hmm, this post is pointless.

Mis·ter ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mstr)
n.
Used as a courtesy title before the surname, full name, or professional title of a man, usually written in its abbreviated form: Mr. Jones; Mr. Secretary.
Used as the official term of address for certain U.S. military personnel, such as warrant officers.
mister Informal. Used as a form of address for a man: Watch your step, mister.
Informal. Used as a term of reference by a woman of her husband.


Thats where I the definition from.

Now you refer to the US as the 'traditional place' May I remind you that it wasn't dicovered till 1492. There were other cultures around before then. In Germany a person is legally allowed to drink when their 16, I would not be an expert but I would also have a stab and say that in England it is 18.

The age of adulthood in Australia is 18. Wait what country are we in? And where does our history branch from the USA, some of it maybe, but I wish to remind you that we were in fact colonised by the British. Shove your argument about American traditions, for it is useless.

"If I don't stay out of this argument, will you bash me like you're going to bash Magro? In which case I'd better brace myself for the phantom bashing of a lifetime"

I don't know about this comment. Sounds to me like you got a little pissed at me and maybe your the one who wants to hit me. If thats your feelings go ahead. Never in my post did I threaten you.

I love how you try to abuse me by demeaning my request for a title, which was posted under good humour. Unfortunately I guess some people don't see it as that way.

Lady Brandell, Grandmaster of Whinging and Bitching?

Is this supposed to offend me. Really Chris this was a low blow something I belive you commented on before, when we debated about Penrith. I will not try to give you a name although a few spring to my head at the moment.

I like how you pick out the petty things in my argument. It shows how little an argument you can actually present.

What ever makes you sleep better at night.

Nevermind

I agree with Magro. Randell, if you want to win so bad, I'm more than happy to 'concede' defeat if it'll boost your flagging self-esteem.

But..... I like to feed my ego, so let's keep on going!

I seem to recall having read your defintion previously. Oh wait! I did, in your previous post! Was this included for any particular reason? Or was it just so your return would look longer. I read your defintion, it still didn't prove or disprove anything.

Onto another definition. Did you not notice that your 'master' definition was just one of many? How are you to know that Kermitt (who, may I point out, is fictional) wasn't referring to you in the sense of a person of respect?

Now you refer to the US as the 'traditional place' May I remind you that it wasn't dicovered till 1492. There were other cultures around before then. In Germany a person is legally allowed to drink when their 16, I would not be an expert but I would also have a stab and say that in England it is 18.
Wow Randell, you're up on your contemporary history. The age of twenty one being used to represent adulthood is an English tradition. Just because pro-equality petitioning has had the legal age in England (and Australia, which I had no idea I was a member of until your timely reminder) raised doesn't change the fact that traditionally twenty one was the age at which a person 'comes of age'. Why do you think we make such a big deal of it now? For the fact it is a multiple of seven (shock! horror! That's Gawd's number!).

I don't know about this comment. Sounds to me like you got a little pissed at me and maybe your the one who wants to hit me. If thats your feelings go ahead. Never in my post did I threaten you.

Au contraire my friend. Why would I resort to physical violence when I derive much more pleasure from making you look (and probably feel) like an idiot without tiring myself.

My comment, of course, was in reference to your recent hatred of Magro after Fairfield's beating of Hawkesbury. At the risk of sounding too much like a nagging mother. 'It's just a game'.

Finally, as it seems you have completely missed the point of this thread. Your 'attack' on Magro (or so you claim) was in good humour. So was Kermitt's. Why is it that you can't take mine as such?

But, I tire of this. It seems to be the arguments between us always follow a set path.
1. Brandell says something stupid.
2. Chris responds
3. Brandell says more stupid stuff
4. Chris responds
5. Brandell gets uppity and writes hate poetry
6. Chris laughs

Ad infinitum. The world turns. Brandell hates someone. And Chris goes on not caring.

Have a nice day. ;)

Sir Chris, Grandmaster of Arguing with Lady Brandell, Grandmistress of Whining and Bitching

I forgot the full stop.

FULL STOP!